Industrials

Dry Bulk Shipping Rates: Tidal Wave of Supply Growth Still On the Way

More on the Baltic Dry Index, the index of spot rates for dry bulk commodity shipping (iron ore, coal, grains). After rallying substantially earlier this year, the BDI has pulled back substantially from 4,000 levels now to below 3,000. We had pointed out the threats to the BDI, and highlighted Transport Trackers call that BDI speculation at 4,000+ was a bad bet to be making. Well, we can further highlight the over-supply problem for dry bulk shipping, from the massive orderbook racked up during the recent bulk shipping boom. Dry bulk bulls argue that economic hardship will lead to massive orderbook cancellations, but Transport Trackers points out that even pretty aggressive ship cancellation assumptions are unlikely to change the fact that the oversupply problem is set to get worse before it gets better. Take a look at this chart from their recent piece: Note the supply growth rates for 2009-2010 and note that demand growth has fallen well below recent levels. So you have peak supply growth hitting far from peak demand growth. How can you expect anything towards peak dry bulk shipping rates? Note that BDI 4,000 is still a very strong rate vs. where it has been, shown here.

Wishful thinking: We’ve seen estimates from 15 – 50% for {cancelations-slippage-delays} of the bulk orderbook. The high end figures are wishful thinking in terms of market impact. We side with a 15% range figure, yet agree many vessels are/have been delayed. To note, when thinking of 40-50% cancelations-slippage is that also many rightly pointed out the real orderbook was perhaps 20% bigger at peak than that officially recorded back in mid-08. So, taking 40% off of the larger estimate would generate -28%, for arguments’ sake. Another trick we found was to annualize cancelation-delays based on 1Q09 world meltdown data.

BDI Speculation: Beware the Unwinding of Congestion/Inventory Build

After a relatively quiet week for dry bulk shipping rates (for things like iron ore, coking & thermal coal, and grains), I thought it was useful to report Mr. Charles de Trenck's recent words on Baltic Dry Index (BDI) speculation. The BDI has held up lately, but has been helped by continuing port congestion and Chinese port inventory build. To me, it seems the BDI above 4000 likely requires these factors to continue and as they are likely unsustainable, as Transport Trackers reiterated, "chasing the BDI above 4000 makes no sense". In the short term, the BDI can go anywhere, but odds are stacked against you in the current environment. For example, see my recent piece in regards to declining steel and seaborne iron ore trade this year, which is a major headwind the BDI faces in 2H09 especially after the spectacular growth of the bulk shipping fleet in the recent shipping boom.

BDI speculation: We exited the BDI rebound above 4000 in early June, and all we have seen in recent weeks are speculative and volatile commodities’ moves. In other words…froth. And this even though there were too many Capes sucked into China congestion (ie, the ramp up in China congestion in recent months). We continue to think select cargo cover charters can offer opportunities, while chasing BDI above 4000 makes no sense

The Sharp Steel Slowdown in 2009 and Iron Ore Overcapacity 2009-2011

UNCTAD recently released report forecasting a 15% decline in global steel demand, which comes after a 1.4% decline in 2008. While most of the world is expected to experience sharp declines in demand, even China is expected to see a 5% decline, though in 1Q09 China still eked out 0.8% of demand growth.

 

The global contraction in demand has resulted in extremely low May 2009 capacity utilization levels of 43%, 49%, and 55% for the steel industries in the US, Europe, and Japan. Again, even China, despite its growth, was recently about 78% utlization as per the UNCTAD piece, and via other sources is expected to see capacity utilization in the 70% range this year due to over expansion of steel capacity.

What does the YTD data vs. forecasts tell us? We haven't seen the worst yet out of China. The UNCTAD report implies that most of the 5% decline in Chinese demand should be weighted towards the second half of 2009. The worst is yet to come from China in terms of steel demand, and keep in mind UNCTAD takes note of Chinese government stimulus plans. Falling capacity utilization forecasts fro YTD vs. full year 2009 imply the same.

The Interplay Between Oil Hoarding at Sea and OPEC Decisions

A lot of oil has been floating in idle tankers at sea recently, as traders sought to hoard oil and take advantage of contango (higher future prices than current).

The number of supertankers being used to store crude and oil products shrank by about a third since March [according to ICAP]... About 30 very large crude carriers (VLCCs) are in use now, compared with about 45 late in the first quarter, shipping analyst Simon Newman said on Wednesday... A supertanker can hold about two million barrels of crude, more than France consumes every day.

The amount of oil stored at sea climbed to the highest in at least two decades, Frontline Ltd, the biggest supertanker operator, said in January. Traders sought to profit from contango, where longer-dated contracts are more expensive than near-term supply. The spread is profitable so long as it exceeds storage and finance costs.

I always found the hoarding of oil at sea an interesting dynamic in the tanker shipping world. For perspective, 15 less ships at sea hoarding oil is 30m barrels of crude, which compares to about 85m barrels/day global consumption.

Understanding the Impact of China on Iron Ore

In 1990, China imported 14.2 million tonnes of iron ore.

In 2002 it was taking in 112 million tonnes and last year it consumed 443 million tonnes -- about 45 per cent of the world total. That figure is widely expected to be exceeded this year.

While I was first introduced to the massive impact of China on the ore trade back when I first started researching shipping, I thought posting this was a useful factoid to keep in mind. More to come on this later.

40% of Domestic Chinese Ore Producers Could Close

UNCTAD has forecast that as much as 40% of Chinese domestic iron ore product could close down in the coming years due to rising costs locally, and lower freight costs internationally having made seaborne iron ore more competitive.

The agency’s annual report on the 2008 iron ore industry forecasts what it called a “great Chinese shakeout” resulting in widespread mine closures and even greater reliance on imported iron ore — a key driver of demand for the bulk carrier freight market. “It is probable that between one third and one half of Chinese iron ore capacity will close over the next three years, with 40%, or 130-150m tonnes, being the most likely reduction figure,” the report said.

This could be a nice balancing mechanism for seaborne iron ore shipping rates, since if rates sky rocket, then less domestic producers are likely to close, but if rates fall, more domestic producers close down, removing domestic Chinese iron ore supply and thereby adding to seaborne demand. I have tried to find the original UNCTAD report which Lloyd's List quoted, but don't have the time to dig around their site. If someone has a link, would love to see it. Thanks. Anyhow, continuing...

Live Interactive Ship Location Map

Now this is cool. Hellenic Shipping has a Google Maps mashup showing interactive, live data on the global shipping fleet. The data below is... 1 minutes and 53 seconds old. Love the internet.

Cosco Pacific Container Terminal Traffic Declines Continue

Hong Kong's Costco Pacific reported overall container terminal volume down 8.6% YoY in May, which is slightly worse than the number for 1Q09, which was down 8%. Costco's terminals are mostly in China, though they have some terminals abroad (Antwerp & The Suez Canal for example). Simply put, hard to see any green shoots here yet. FYI, A prime US-listed container stock related to this data is Hong Kong's Seaspan (SSW).

Syndicate content