Materials

BDI Speculation: Beware the Unwinding of Congestion/Inventory Build

After a relatively quiet week for dry bulk shipping rates (for things like iron ore, coking & thermal coal, and grains), I thought it was useful to report Mr. Charles de Trenck's recent words on Baltic Dry Index (BDI) speculation. The BDI has held up lately, but has been helped by continuing port congestion and Chinese port inventory build. To me, it seems the BDI above 4000 likely requires these factors to continue and as they are likely unsustainable, as Transport Trackers reiterated, "chasing the BDI above 4000 makes no sense". In the short term, the BDI can go anywhere, but odds are stacked against you in the current environment. For example, see my recent piece in regards to declining steel and seaborne iron ore trade this year, which is a major headwind the BDI faces in 2H09 especially after the spectacular growth of the bulk shipping fleet in the recent shipping boom.

BDI speculation: We exited the BDI rebound above 4000 in early June, and all we have seen in recent weeks are speculative and volatile commodities’ moves. In other words…froth. And this even though there were too many Capes sucked into China congestion (ie, the ramp up in China congestion in recent months). We continue to think select cargo cover charters can offer opportunities, while chasing BDI above 4000 makes no sense

The Sharp Steel Slowdown in 2009 and Iron Ore Overcapacity 2009-2011

UNCTAD recently released report forecasting a 15% decline in global steel demand, which comes after a 1.4% decline in 2008. While most of the world is expected to experience sharp declines in demand, even China is expected to see a 5% decline, though in 1Q09 China still eked out 0.8% of demand growth.

 

The global contraction in demand has resulted in extremely low May 2009 capacity utilization levels of 43%, 49%, and 55% for the steel industries in the US, Europe, and Japan. Again, even China, despite its growth, was recently about 78% utlization as per the UNCTAD piece, and via other sources is expected to see capacity utilization in the 70% range this year due to over expansion of steel capacity.

What does the YTD data vs. forecasts tell us? We haven't seen the worst yet out of China. The UNCTAD report implies that most of the 5% decline in Chinese demand should be weighted towards the second half of 2009. The worst is yet to come from China in terms of steel demand, and keep in mind UNCTAD takes note of Chinese government stimulus plans. Falling capacity utilization forecasts fro YTD vs. full year 2009 imply the same.

The Interplay Between Oil Hoarding at Sea and OPEC Decisions

A lot of oil has been floating in idle tankers at sea recently, as traders sought to hoard oil and take advantage of contango (higher future prices than current).

The number of supertankers being used to store crude and oil products shrank by about a third since March [according to ICAP]... About 30 very large crude carriers (VLCCs) are in use now, compared with about 45 late in the first quarter, shipping analyst Simon Newman said on Wednesday... A supertanker can hold about two million barrels of crude, more than France consumes every day.

The amount of oil stored at sea climbed to the highest in at least two decades, Frontline Ltd, the biggest supertanker operator, said in January. Traders sought to profit from contango, where longer-dated contracts are more expensive than near-term supply. The spread is profitable so long as it exceeds storage and finance costs.

I always found the hoarding of oil at sea an interesting dynamic in the tanker shipping world. For perspective, 15 less ships at sea hoarding oil is 30m barrels of crude, which compares to about 85m barrels/day global consumption.

Understanding the Impact of China on Iron Ore

In 1990, China imported 14.2 million tonnes of iron ore.

In 2002 it was taking in 112 million tonnes and last year it consumed 443 million tonnes -- about 45 per cent of the world total. That figure is widely expected to be exceeded this year.

While I was first introduced to the massive impact of China on the ore trade back when I first started researching shipping, I thought posting this was a useful factoid to keep in mind. More to come on this later.

40% of Domestic Chinese Ore Producers Could Close

UNCTAD has forecast that as much as 40% of Chinese domestic iron ore product could close down in the coming years due to rising costs locally, and lower freight costs internationally having made seaborne iron ore more competitive.

The agency’s annual report on the 2008 iron ore industry forecasts what it called a “great Chinese shakeout” resulting in widespread mine closures and even greater reliance on imported iron ore — a key driver of demand for the bulk carrier freight market. “It is probable that between one third and one half of Chinese iron ore capacity will close over the next three years, with 40%, or 130-150m tonnes, being the most likely reduction figure,” the report said.

This could be a nice balancing mechanism for seaborne iron ore shipping rates, since if rates sky rocket, then less domestic producers are likely to close, but if rates fall, more domestic producers close down, removing domestic Chinese iron ore supply and thereby adding to seaborne demand. I have tried to find the original UNCTAD report which Lloyd's List quoted, but don't have the time to dig around their site. If someone has a link, would love to see it. Thanks. Anyhow, continuing...

Higher Chinese Iron Ore Imports Are Not Necessarily Green Shoots

I pulled an interesting point from Citi's latest June 10th Iron Ore piece by Alan Heap regarding BHP, Rio Tinto, and CVRD. It is a warning signal for those who see a higher BDI and higher Chinese iron ore imports as a "green shoot".

At one point he explains in the piece, that while Chinese imports of iron ore have been up 25% YTD, Chinese steel production has only been up 3%. What makes up the difference? Falling domestic iron ore production plus some inventory build. Note I have provided links to online sources with similar numbers to what Citi has, just to give some verification beyond the report. 

My addition to the Citi point is that it shows that an increase in Chinese demand for seaborne iron ore doesn't necessarily mean an increase in total Chinese demand. You would want to see steel production increasing in a similar fashion in order to claim that higher Chinese ore imports were a sign of growth. So while other green shoots may exist in the world, higher Chinese seaborne iron ore imports YTD isn't one of them. This also sheds some light on the recent BDI rally and why it may be a fake-out.

Bioplastics, The Other Side of Biotech

Despite my career in finance, in college I was studying biology in order to enter the Biotech industry, but mainly due to Biotech's potential for manufacturing materials rather than in regards to drugs. While I am confident that fields of plants commercially creating complete plastics will be a reality, we still have some time. Yet a more basic form of plant-based plastics, those made from vegetable products such as vegetable oil or corn starch, is starting to peak it's head out.

Baltic Dry Index as a Reliable Forward Indicator? Nonsense.

In finance, be cautious of anyone who uses historical correlation to back up their argument. In shipping, just flat out run from them. Shipping's notorious Baltic Dry Index, which is an index of spot rates for shipping dry bulk commodities such as coal and iron ore around the world, achieved deathdefying heights and then, well, death-causing lows, in the course of 2008, falling 90% from its peak, and attracted a lot of attention in the process both on the way up and down. The BDI meme is still alive, especially given a recent rally, and we have quite a few people claiming it as a quality indicator, or even the best indicator (sheesh) for the direction of stock markets or the world economy. Unfortunately, a lot of smart people misunderstand what the BDI represents.

Not a Reliable Leading Indicator - The BDI

Syndicate content